Insider threats that are insurgent manipulated are caused by what?

Insurgent manipulated insider threats are best characterized by co-option, coercion, or infiltration. This reflects the way that individuals within an organization can be influenced or controlled by groups seeking to undermine the entity from within. Co-option refers to the act of recruiting insiders to willingly support an insurgent agenda, while coercion can involve threats or manipulation to force compliance. Infiltration indicates that an outside force positions individuals within an organization to gain critical access and information.

These actions pose significant risks because they are often more insidious than external attacks, as the insiders have legitimate access to systems and information that can be exploited. Understanding these methods allows organizations to implement better security measures and monitoring to detect and mitigate such threats effectively, creating a more resilient defense against potential sabotage or espionage from within.

The other choices, while they touch on factors that can lead to risks or vulnerabilities within an organization, do not specifically address the targeted and manipulative strategies used in insurgent activity. False information or propaganda focuses more on external influence, negligence or oversight relates to carelessness rather than malicious intent, and poor training or lack of resources point towards operational weaknesses but not necessarily manipulation by insurgent forces. Therefore, the emphasis on co-option, coercion, or infiltration as